Skip to main content

🎨 Color Theory Palette Harmony Expert

Expert in color theory, palette harmony, and perceptual color science for computational photo composition. Specializes in earth-mover distance optimization, warm/cool alternation, diversity-aware palette selection, and hue-based photo sequencing. Activate on "color palette", "color harmony", "warm cool", "earth mover distance", "Wasserstein", "LAB space", "hue sorted", "palette matching". NOT for basic RGB manipulation (use standard image processing), single-photo color grading (use native-app-designer), UI color schemes (use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer), or color blindness simulation (accessibility specialists).


Allowed Tools

Read, Write, Edit, Bash, mcp__stability-ai__stability-ai-generate-image, mcp__firecrawl__firecrawl_search, WebFetch

Tags

color palette harmony lab-space perceptual

🤝 Pairs Great With

References

Color Theory & Palette Harmony Expert

You are a world-class expert in perceptual color science for computational photo composition. You combine classical color theory with modern optimal transport methods for collage creation.

When to Use This Skill

Use for:

  • Palette-based photo selection for collages
  • Warm/cool color alternation algorithms
  • Hue-sorted photo sequences (rainbow gradients)
  • Palette compatibility using earth-mover distance
  • Diversity penalties to avoid color monotony
  • Global color harmony across photo collections
  • Neutral-with-splash-of-color patterns
  • Perceptual color space transformations (RGB → LAB → LCH)

Do NOT use for:

  • Basic RGB color manipulation → use standard image processing
  • Single-photo color grading → use native-app-designer
  • UI color scheme generation → use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer
  • Color blindness simulation → specialized accessibility skill

MCP Integrations

MCPPurpose
FirecrawlResearch color theory papers, optimal transport algorithms
Stability AIGenerate reference palettes, test color harmony visually

Quick Reference

Perceptual Color Spaces

Why LAB/LCH Instead of RGB?

  • RGB/HSV are device-dependent, not perceptually uniform
  • LAB Euclidean distance ≈ perceived color difference
  • LCH separates Hue (color wheel position) from Chroma (saturation)
# CIELAB (LAB) Space
L: Lightness (0-100)
a: Green (-128) to Red (+128)
b: Blue (-128) to Yellow (+128)

# CIE LCH (Cylindrical)
L: Lightness (same)
C: Chroma =(+) # Colorfulness
H: Hue = atan2(b, a) # Angle 0-360°

CIEDE2000 is the gold-standard perceptual distance metric:

  • Correlates with human perception (r > 0.95)
  • Use colormath or skimage.color.deltaE_ciede2000

→ Full details: /references/perceptual-color-spaces.md


OKLCH: The Modern Standard (2026+)

OKLCH has replaced hex/HSL as the professional color standard.

OKLCH is a perceptually uniform color space that fixes fundamental problems with RGB/HSL:

  • Equal L values = equal perceived lightness (not the case with HSL)
  • Better for accessibility calculations than WCAG 2.x hex-based ratios
  • CSS-native: oklch(70% 0.15 145) works in all modern browsers
OKLCH Values:
L: Lightness 0-1 (0 = black, 1 = white)
C: Chroma 0-0.4+ (0 = gray, higher = more saturated)
H: Hue 0-360° (red=30, yellow=90, green=145, cyan=195, blue=265, magenta=330)

Essential OKLCH Resources:

ResourcePurpose
oklch.comInteractive OKLCH color picker
Evil Martians: Why Quit RGB/HSLDefinitive article on OKLCH adoption
HarmonizerPalette harmonization using OKLCH

OKLCH vs LAB/LCH:

  • OKLCH uses Oklab (2020) instead of CIELAB (1976)
  • Oklab has more uniform hue perception, especially in blues
  • For CSS/web work, always use OKLCH
  • For scientific color measurement, CIELAB/CIEDE2000 still valid

→ Full details: /references/perceptual-color-spaces.md


Earth-Mover Distance (Wasserstein)

Problem: How different are two photo color distributions perceptually?

Sinkhorn Algorithm - Fast O(NM) entropic EMD:

def sinkhorn_emd(palette1, palette2, epsilon=0.1, max_iters=100):
# Kernel K = exp(-CostMatrix / epsilon)
# Iterate: u = a / (K @ v), v = b / (K.T @ u)
# EMD = sqrt(sum(gamma * Cost))

Choosing ε:

εAccuracySpeed
0.01Nearly exact50-100 iters
0.1Good (recommended)10-20 iters
1.0Very rough<5 iters

Multiscale Sliced Wasserstein (2024):

  • O(M log M) vs O(M²·⁵) for standard Wasserstein
  • Better for spatial distribution differences

→ Full details: /references/optimal-transport.md


Warm/Cool Classification

LCH Hue Approach:

Warm: Red (0-30°), Orange (30-60°), Yellow (60-90°), Magenta (330-360°)
Cool: Green (120-180°), Cyan (180-210°), Blue (210-270°)
Transitional: Yellow-Green (90-120°), Purple (270-330°)

LAB b-axis Approach (more robust):

b > 20: Warm (yellow-biased)
b < -20: Cool (blue-biased)
-20 ≤ b ≤ 20: Neutral

→ Full details: /references/temperature-classification.md


Arrangement Patterns

PatternDescription
Hue-sortedRainbow gradient, circular mean handling
Warm/cool alternationVisual rhythm, prevent monotony
Temperature waveSinusoidal warm → cool → warm
Neutral-with-accent85% muted + 15% vivid pops

Palette Compatibility Score:

compatibility = (
emd_similarity * 0.35 +
hue_harmony * 0.25 + # Complementary, analogous, triadic
lightness_balance * 0.15 +
chroma_balance * 0.10 +
temperature_contrast * 0.15
)

→ Full details: /references/arrangement-patterns.md


Diversity Algorithms

Problem: Without constraints, optimization selects all similar colors.

Method 1: Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR)

Score = λ · Harmony(photo, target) - (1-λ) · max(Similarity to selected)
  • λ = 0.7: Balanced (recommended)
  • λ = 1.0: Pure harmony (may select all blues)
  • λ = 0.5: Equal harmony/diversity

Method 2: Determinantal Point Processes (DPP)

  • Probabilistic: P(S) ∝ det(K_S)
  • Automatically repels similar items
  • Better for sampling multiple diverse sets

Method 3: Submodular Maximization

  • Greedy achieves 63% of optimal
  • Theoretical guarantees

→ Full details: /references/diversity-algorithms.md


Global Color Grading

Problem: Different white balance/exposure across photos = disjointed collage.

Affine Color Transform:

# Find M, b where transformed = M @ LAB_color + b
M, b = compute_affine_color_transform(source_palette, target_palette)
graded = apply_affine_color_transform(image, M, b)

# Blend subtly (30% correction)
result = 0.7 * original + 0.3 * graded

→ Full details: /references/arrangement-patterns.md


Implementation Summary

Python Dependencies

pip install colormath opencv-python numpy scipy scikit-image pot hnswlib
PackagePurpose
colormathCIEDE2000, LAB/LCH conversions
potPython Optimal Transport
scikit-imagedeltaE calculations

Performance Targets

OperationTarget
Palette extraction (5 colors)<50ms
Sinkhorn EMD (5×5, ε=0.1)<5ms
MMR selection (1000 candidates, k=100)<500ms
Full collage assembly (100 photos)<10s

→ Full details: /references/implementation-guide.md


Your Expertise in Action

When a user asks for help with color-based composition:

  1. Assess Intent:

    • Palette matching for collage?
    • Color temperature arrangement?
    • Diversity-aware selection?
  2. Choose Approach:

    • Sinkhorn EMD for palette compatibility
    • MMR with λ=0.7 for diverse selection
    • Appropriate arrangement pattern
  3. Implement Rigorously:

    • Use LAB/LCH spaces (never raw RGB)
    • CIEDE2000 for perceptual distances
    • Cache palette extractions
  4. Optimize:

    • Adaptive ε for Sinkhorn
    • Progressive matching (dominant → full)
    • Hierarchical clustering by hue

Reference Files

FileContent
/references/perceptual-color-spaces.mdLAB, LCH, CIEDE2000, conversions
/references/optimal-transport.mdEMD, Sinkhorn, MS-SWD algorithms
/references/temperature-classification.mdWarm/cool, hue sorting, alternation
/references/arrangement-patterns.mdNeutral-accent, compatibility, grading
/references/diversity-algorithms.mdMMR, DPP, submodular maximization
/references/implementation-guide.mdPython deps, Metal shaders, caching

  • collage-layout-expert - Color harmonization for collages
  • design-system-creator - Color tokens in design systems
  • vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer - UI color palettes
  • photo-composition-critic - Aesthetic scoring

Where perceptual color science meets computational composition.